POST-TRIAL REVIEW PROCESS
Record Of Trial and Authentication. After trial, a record
of the trial proceedings is prepared by the court reporter. It is provided to both the trial counsel
(prosecutor) and the defense counsel for correction, and is then authenticated
(certified as accurate) by the military judge.
The nature of adjudged sentence determines the type of record of trial
that is required, verbatim or summarized.
For a verbatim record of trial, the sentence must include one of the
following punishments: dismissal, dishonorable discharge, bad-conduct
discharge, confinement for more than six months, forfeiture of more than
two-thirds pay per month or forfeitures for more than six months. Other records of trial are summarized. Although some very limited post-trial actions
can be taken without the authenticated record of trial, the review process
requires the completed record of trial.
Effective Date of Punishments.
Any
period of confinement included in the sentence of a court-martial begins to run
from the date the sentence is adjudged unless deferred or suspended. Adjudged reductions in rank and adjudged
forfeitures of pay and allowances are effective fourteen days after the
sentence is adjudged or upon action of the convening authority, whichever is
sooner. However, any sentence which
includes confinement for more than six months or death, or confinement for six
months or less and a dishonorable or bad-conduct discharge or dismissal results
in a mandatory forfeiture of pay fourteen days after the sentence was adjudged,
even if no forfeitures were adjudged.
Under these requirements, a general court-martial results in total forfeiture
of pay and allowances (allowances are separate payments for housing and food)
during confinement, and a special court-martial results in forfeiture of
two-thirds pay (but not allowances) during confinement. When the accused (defendant) has a family,
the convening authority may waive the mandatory forfeitures for up to six
months and re-direct pay and allowances for support of the accused’s
family. Other potential punishments (e.g.,
fines, restriction to specified limits, hard labor without confinement) are
effective when approved in the convening authority’s action. Dismissals, dishonorable discharges and
bad-conduct discharges must be approved by the convening authority, but cannot
be ordered executed (issued) until appellate review is completed.
Deferment Requests.
Upon written application
of the defendant, the convening authority may defer adjudged confinement,
forfeitures or reduction in rank.
Deferment is a postponement of the beginning of the sentence. It is not a suspension of the sentence, and
it is not a form of clemency. The
accused has the burden of showing that his interest and the community's
interests in deferment outweigh the community's interests in imposition of
punishment. In making the decision, the
convening authority may consider, among others, the following factors: the
probability of flight; the probability of commission of other offenses;
intimidation of witnesses; interference with the administration of justice; the
nature of the offenses (including the effect on the victim); the sentence
adjudged; the command's immediate need for the accused; the effect of deferment
on good order and discipline in the command; and, the accused's character,
mental condition, family situation, and service record. Deferments end when the convening authority
takes action, when the punishment is suspended, when the deferment expires by
its own terms, or by other rescission.
Staff Judge Advocate
(SJA) Review and Defense Response. A formal legal recommendation is
required to be prepared in all general courts-martial and in special
courts-martial where a bad- conduct discharge is adjudged. An impartial Staff Judge Advocate signs the
recommendation. That recommendation is
served on the accused's attorney and the accused, who have ten days to submit
comments. The ten-day period can be
extended for an additional twenty days.
These comments can address legal errors, provide facts supporting
reversal of the findings of guilty or clemency.
The accused and his or her attorney determine the scope of clemency
matters. Clemency matters may include a
repeat of matters presented at trial, other evidence of good character,
post-trial statements from friends, or relatives, evidence of financial
hardship, and evidence of the adjudged sentence’s effect upon the accused’s
family. These comments, if any, along with the recommendation of the Staff
Judge Advocate are forwarded to the convening authority for action.
Convening Authority Options and Action. The convening
authority performs the initial step in the review process and has extensive
discretion when taking action on a case.
In taking action, the convening authority either approves the findings
and sentence or may change either or both of them. He or she may dismiss any offense or change
the finding of guilty of any offense to one of a lesser-included offense. The convening authority may disapprove the
findings of guilty or all, or any part of, a legal sentence. However, court-martial findings of “not
guilty” are final when adjudged and may not be later changed by the convening
authority. He or she may reduce or
suspend a sentence or change the punishment to one of a different nature so
long as the severity of the punishment is not increased. The convening authority may approve a
sentence only if he or she determines that it is warranted by the offense(s)
and appropriate for the accused soldier.
For example, the convening authority may reduce or eliminate any
confinement, may change a dishonorable discharge to a bad-conduct discharge,
and may reduce a sentence of death to imprisonment. Prior to taking action, the convening
authority must consider the results of trial, the recommendation of the Staff
Judge Advocate, and any matters submitted by the defense attorney and the
accused. In general, the appellate
process does not begin until the convening authority has taken action.
Click Here to Learn More About the Appeals Process